Use explicit jobs to control runs-on #19

Merged
2franix merged 1 commit from explicit_runs_on into main 2025-02-23 22:11:29 +01:00
Owner

Controlling runs-on via inputs does not seem to work reliably. It looks like the choice of a runner is made no matter what the input is.

Let's create three explicit jobs to represent the three values for this property.

Controlling `runs-on` via inputs does not seem to work reliably. It looks like the choice of a runner is made no matter what the input is. Let's create three explicit jobs to represent the three values for this property.
Use explicit jobs to control runs-on
All checks were successful
CI / Lint and format files (pull_request) Successful in 37s
6d2bb73214
2franix deleted branch explicit_runs_on 2025-02-23 22:11:30 +01:00
2franix referenced this pull request from a commit 2025-02-23 22:13:53 +01:00
2franix referenced this pull request from a commit 2025-02-23 22:27:13 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: self-hosting/workflows#19
No description provided.